Consumer Protection Enforcement

Impact of the Supreme Court's decision on the FTC's ability to obtain monetary relief for consumers in federal court.

1. AMG Capital Management, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission

2. Jurisdiction: United States (April 22, 2021)
3. Defendants<![CDATA[Scott Tucker]]><![CDATA[AMG Capital Management, LLC]]><![CDATA[Level 5 Motorsports LLC]]><![CDATA[Black Creek Capital Corporation]]><![CDATA[Broadmoor Capital Partners]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[Michael Pattillo]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[Joel Marcus]]>Judges<![CDATA[Stephen Breyer]]><![CDATA[Gloria Navarro]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]><![CDATA[Supreme Court of the United States]]><![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]]><![CDATA[United States District Court for the District of Nevada]]>
4. Case Tags: FTC Act Section 13(b);Equitable Monetary Relief;Payday Lending Fraud;Consumer Protection Enforcement