Equitable Estoppel
Doctrine preventing a party from taking a legal position inconsistent with its prior conduct or representations.
GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
- Jurisdiction: United States (June 1, 2020)
- Original Case: GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp., fka Converteam SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC, et al.
- Defendants<![CDATA[GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC]]><![CDATA[Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[Amie Adelia Vague]]><![CDATA[Sara Anne Ford]]><![CDATA[Wesley B. Gilchrist]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[David Gerard Wanhatalo]]><![CDATA[Ricardo Andrew Woods]]>Judges<![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]><![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]><![CDATA[John G. Roberts]]><![CDATA[Ruth Bader Ginsburg]]><![CDATA[Stephen Breyer]]><![CDATA[Samuel Alito]]><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]><![CDATA[Neil Gorsuch]]><![CDATA[Brett Kavanaugh]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Supreme Court of the United States]]><![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit]]><![CDATA[United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama]]><![CDATA[ThyssenKrupp Stainless USA, LLC]]><![CDATA[F. L. Industries, Inc.]]><![CDATA[Fives St Corp.]]>
- Case Tags: International Arbitration;New York Convention;Equitable Estoppel;Non-Signatory Enforcement