Fifth Amendment Takings Clause
The case interprets the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment, which requires just compensation when private property is taken for public use.
Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid
- Jurisdiction: United States (June 23, 2021)
- Defendants<![CDATA[Victoria Hassid]]><![CDATA[Genevieve Shiroma]]><![CDATA[Isadore Hall III]]><![CDATA[California Agricultural Labor Relations Board]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Cedar Point Nursery]]><![CDATA[Fowler Packing Company]]>Judges<![CDATA[John Roberts]]><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]><![CDATA[Samuel Alito]]><![CDATA[Neil Gorsuch]]><![CDATA[Brett Kavanaugh]]><![CDATA[Amy Coney Barrett]]><![CDATA[Stephen Breyer]]><![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Supreme Court of the United States]]><![CDATA[California Agricultural Labor Relations Board]]><![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]]>
- Case Tags: Fifth Amendment Takings Clause;Property Rights;Agricultural Labor Relations;Per Se Physical Taking
Knick v. Township of Scott
- Jurisdiction: United States (June 21, 2019)
- VictimsRose Mary KnickDefendantsTownship of ScottPlaintiffsRose Mary KnickJudgesJohn G. Roberts, Jr.Elena KaganInstitutionsSupreme Court of the United StatesTownship of Scott, Pennsylvania
- Case Tags: Fifth Amendment Takings Clause;Property Rights;Supreme Court Precedent Overruled;Federal Jurisdiction
DeVillier v. Texas
- Jurisdiction: United States (April 16, 2024)
- Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[State of Texas]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Richard DeVillier]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[Justice Clarence Thomas]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Texas Department of Transportation]]><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit]]>
- Case Tags: Fifth Amendment Takings Clause;Inverse Condemnation;Hurricane Harvey Flooding;U.S. Supreme Court Property Rights

