Immigration Fraud
A scam artist exploits vulnerable immigrants through fake adoption schemes
United States v. Sineneng-Smith
- Jurisdiction: United States (May 7, 2020)
- Victims<![CDATA[Filipino immigrant clients]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Evelyn Sineneng-Smith]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[United States of America]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[Noel J. Francisco]]><![CDATA[Kenneth A. Blanco]]><![CDATA[Susan B. Gray]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[Daniel F. Cook]]><![CDATA[Mark C. Fleming]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[Ruth Bader Ginsburg]]><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]><![CDATA[A. Wallace Tashima]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Supreme Court of the United States]]><![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]]><![CDATA[U.S. Department of Justice]]><![CDATA[U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement]]><![CDATA[U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services]]><![CDATA[American Civil Liberties Union]]><![CDATA[Immigrant Defense Project]]><![CDATA[National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild]]><![CDATA[National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers]]>
- Case Tags: Immigration Fraud;First Amendment Overbreadth;Party Presentation Principle;Supreme Court Review