Lanham Act Section 1117(a)
Interpretation of the Lanham Act's remedies provision and its mental state requirements for profits awards.
Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.
- Jurisdiction: United States (April 23, 2020)
- Original Case: Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil Group, Inc., fka Fossil, Inc., et al.
- Victims<![CDATA[Romag Fasteners, Inc.]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Fossil, Inc.]]><![CDATA[Fossil Stores I, Inc.]]><![CDATA[Macy's, Inc.]]><![CDATA[Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Romag Fasteners, Inc.]]>Investigators<![CDATA[]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[Jeffrey E. Dupler]]><![CDATA[Neal Kumar Katyal]]><![CDATA[Kirti Datla]]><![CDATA[Reedy C. Swanson]]><![CDATA[Danielle D. Stempel]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[Lisa S. Blatt]]><![CDATA[Amy Mason Saharia]]><![CDATA[A. Joshua Podoll]]><![CDATA[Kaitlin J. Beach]]><![CDATA[Jonathan Freiman]]><![CDATA[Jody P. Ellant]]>Judges<![CDATA[Neil M. Gorsuch]]><![CDATA[Samuel A. Alito Jr.]]><![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]><![CDATA[Janet Bond Arterton]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Supreme Court of the United States]]><![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit]]><![CDATA[U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut]]>
- Case Tags: Trademark Infringement;Willfulness Requirement;Lanham Act Section 1117(a);Profits Disgorgement