Tribal Sovereignty

Case involving the scope of federal funding obligations to Native American tribes

1. Haaland v. Brackeen

2. Jurisdiction: United States (June 15, 2023)
3. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Deb Haaland]]><![CDATA[United States Department of the Interior]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Chad Brackeen]]><![CDATA[Jennifer Brackeen]]><![CDATA[State of Texas]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[Elizabeth Prelogar]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[Matthew McGill]]>Judges<![CDATA[Amy Coney Barrett]]><![CDATA[John Roberts]]><![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]><![CDATA[Neil Gorsuch]]><![CDATA[Brett Kavanaugh]]><![CDATA[Ketanji Brown Jackson]]><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]><![CDATA[Samuel Alito]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Supreme Court of the United States]]><![CDATA[Cherokee Nation]]><![CDATA[Navajo Nation]]>
4. Case Tags: Indian Child Welfare Act;Constitutional Law;Tribal Sovereignty;Adoption and Family Law

1. 贝塞拉诉圣卡洛斯阿帕奇部落案

2. Jurisdiction: United States (2024-06-06)
3. Original Case: Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe
4. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Xavier Becerra]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[San Carlos Apache Tribe]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[无]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Supreme Court of the United States]]>
5. Status or Result: 最高法院以5比4裁定，圣卡洛斯阿帕奇部落胜诉，政府必须全额支付合同支持成本。
6. Case Tags: Indian Self-Determination Act;Tribal Sovereignty;Federal Spending Clause;Supreme Court Ruling