Unconstitutional Conditions
Doctrine requiring government permit conditions to have an essential nexus and rough proportionality to the impacts of a proposed development.
Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc.
- Jurisdiction: United States (June 20, 2013)
- Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[United States Agency for International Development]]><![CDATA[Rajiv Shah]]><![CDATA[Kathleen Sebelius]]><![CDATA[Thomas R. Frieden]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Alliance for Open Society International, Inc.]]><![CDATA[Pathfinder International]]><![CDATA[Global Health Council]]><![CDATA[InterAction]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[Sri Srinivasan]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[David W. Bowker]]><![CDATA[Catherine M. A. Carroll]]><![CDATA[Mark C. Fleming]]>Judges<![CDATA[John Roberts]]><![CDATA[Anthony Kennedy]]><![CDATA[Ruth Bader Ginsburg]]><![CDATA[Stephen Breyer]]><![CDATA[Samuel Alito]]><![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Supreme Court of the United States]]><![CDATA[United States Agency for International Development]]><![CDATA[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]]><![CDATA[Department of Health and Human Services]]>
- Case Tags: First Amendment;Unconstitutional Conditions;Compelled Speech;HIV/AIDS Funding