deportation order
Whether a noncitizen can challenge a removal order that was substantively invalid without satisfying administrative exhaustion
United States v. Palomar-Santiago
- Jurisdiction: United States (May 24, 2021)
- Victims<![CDATA[]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Refugio Palomar-Santiago]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[United States]]>Investigators<![CDATA[]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[Elizabeth B. Prelogar]]><![CDATA[Nicholas L. McQuaid]]><![CDATA[Curtise Gannon]]><![CDATA[Erica L. Ross]]><![CDATA[William A. Glaser]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[Bradley N. Garcia]]><![CDATA[Rene L. Valladares]]><![CDATA[Cristen C. Thayer]]><![CDATA[Aarin E. Kevorkian]]><![CDATA[Ellesse Henderson]]><![CDATA[Jeffrey L. Fisher]]><![CDATA[Anna O. Mohan]]><![CDATA[Grace E. Leeper]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[]]>Judges<![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]><![CDATA[John Roberts]]><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]><![CDATA[Stephen Breyer]]><![CDATA[Samuel Alito]]><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]><![CDATA[Neil Gorsuch]]><![CDATA[Brett Kavanaugh]]><![CDATA[Amy Coney Barrett]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Supreme Court of the United States]]><![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]]><![CDATA[United States District Court for the District of Nevada]]><![CDATA[Immigration and Naturalization Service]]><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]>
- Case Tags: illegal reentry;deportation order;administrative exhaustion;Supreme Court