Attorney-Client Privilege
Explore the legal boundaries of attorney-client privilege in federal grand jury investigations
In re Grand Jury
- Jurisdiction: United States (January 23, 2023)
- Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Unnamed Law Firm]]>Investigators<![CDATA[Federal Grand Jury]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[United States Department of Justice]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[Unnamed Attorney for the Law Firm]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[John G. Roberts]]><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]><![CDATA[Samuel A. Alito]]><![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]><![CDATA[Neil M. Gorsuch]]><![CDATA[Brett M. Kavanaugh]]><![CDATA[Amy Coney Barrett]]><![CDATA[Ketanji Brown Jackson]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Supreme Court of the United States]]><![CDATA[United States Department of Justice]]>
- Case Tags: Attorney-Client Privilege;Dual-Purpose Communications;Grand Jury Subpoena;U.S. Supreme Court Ruling