Dual-Purpose Communications

Analysis of the primary purpose test for communications containing both legal and non-legal advice

1. In re Grand Jury

2. Jurisdiction: United States (January 23, 2023)
3. Victims<![CDATA[None]]>Defendants<![CDATA[None]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[None]]>Investigators<![CDATA[None]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[None]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[None]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[None]]>Judges<![CDATA[None]]>Institutions<![CDATA[United States Supreme Court]]><![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]]><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Service]]><![CDATA[Unnamed law firm]]><![CDATA[Unnamed corporate client]]>
4. Case Tags: Attorney-Client Privilege;Grand Jury Subpoena;Tax Practitioner Privilege;Dual-Purpose Communications