Rule 59(e)

The Supreme Court holds that a timely Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend a habeas judgment is part of the first habeas proceeding, not a successive petition.

1. Banister v. Davis

2. Jurisdiction: United States (June 1, 2020)
3. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Gregory Dean Banister]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[Gerard J. Cedrone]]><![CDATA[Brian T. Burgess]]><![CDATA[Andrew Kim]]><![CDATA[Kelsey Pelagalli]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]><![CDATA[John G. Roberts]]><![CDATA[Ruth Bader Ginsburg]]><![CDATA[Stephen Breyer]]><![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]><![CDATA[Neil Gorsuch]]><![CDATA[Brett Kavanaugh]]><![CDATA[Samuel Alito]]><![CDATA[Clarence Thomas]]>Institutions<![CDATA[Supreme Court of the United States]]><![CDATA[United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit]]><![CDATA[Texas Department of Criminal Justice]]>
4. Case Tags: Habeas Corpus;AEDPA;Rule 59(e);Supreme Court of the United States